It’s not controversial to say the city of Inglewood, California is no safe harbour for the American way of life. For decades, the reputation of unethical police shootings from unaccountable law enforcement has earned itself rise in urban notoriety to the levels of Chicago, Baltimore and Detroit.
Following the election of current Mayor James T. Butts Jr., an African-American and the former police chief of Santa Monica, concerned citizens were desperate for a change that was never going to come. Instead of following the suggestions of Campaign Zero, allowing for more culpable police reforms and community oversight powers, the city has instead decided to skirt past a new state transparency law by destroying police records from the last 20 years, according to an investigative report from The LA Times.
The decision was reportedly made during an Inglewood City Council meeting earlier last month which authorized the destruction of more than 100 police records dating back to 1991 before Senate Bill 1421 went into effect on New Years Day. By California law, police departments are now expected to retrain all existing records of “officer shootings” and “internal misconduct investigations”, including incidents ranging from sexual assault to potential murder, for at least five years.
There’d surely be an interesting story amidst all the paperwork, such as the widely cited 2016 shooting in which several officers opened fire on a couple sitting inside a car. According to Vox, this even resulted in several officer firings and calls for the new law’s passage. After all, as the old saying goes: “If there’s nothing to hide, there’s nothing to fear.” Local governments can’t hide their secrets behind the excuse of somehow ensuring national security or some authoritarian right to regime privacy. The reason for such destruction, at such a pivotal moment in public transparency, must be rich.
And so it is. Just before the end of the year, the city council resolution approved the Inglewood Police Department’s convenient claim that these records were suddenly “obsolete” which “occupy valuable space” and are “of no further use”, meaning there’s suddenly nothing to see here as the accused curiously purge their whole department database before the civil liberties advocates could legally review anything. “This premise that there was an intent to beat the clock is ridiculous,” Mayor Butts immediately argued, showing the perfect timing of it all just stinks to high heaven.
“The legislature passed SB 1421 because communities demanded an end to the secrecy cloaking police misconduct and use of force,” declared Marcus Benigno, a spokesman for the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement to the press. “Inglewood PD’s decision to purge records undermines police accountability and transparency against the will of Californians.” He was joined by community activist Earl Ofari Hutchinson who added: “This action sends a terrible message that lack of transparency is still the policy in Inglewood.”
This deception sadly isn’t something new for Inglewood. The LA Times report cites a 2008 incident where the department’s officers fatally shot four citizens, three of which who were revealed to be unarmed. The immediately spawned a civil rights investigation by the U.S. Department Of Justice (DOJ) where they reportedly found “significant flaws” in these use-of-force cases. Another civil lawsuit resulted in Inglewood paying a $2.45 million settlement over their handling of the case.
“Three young men who had done absolutely nothing wrong had their lives changed forever. No amount of money will ever bring back Michael Byoune to his family, but hopefully, through his death, the city will make changes that will help all of the citizens of our community,” said Carl Douglas, an attorney representing the victims and their families, declaring intentions for more police transparency efforts. “For that reason, his death will not be in vain.”
Over the past few years, however, citizens seem to continually die in vain from excessive force by local law enforcement. These narratives of unarmed victims, especially those with ethnic origins, has fuelled decentralised movements pushing identity politics such as Black Lives Matter and other racialised organisations, whose demands range from genuine reforms of state power and allowing the freedom of information to more radical positions of abolishing the sentences of black criminals as “political prisoners”.
Whether these violent or racial disparity cases are merited, unfounded or somewhere in the middle ground—all of which argued across politics and academia during the Obama and Trump administrations — the public must live with their unquelled grievances which could at least be debated honestly through analysis of the provided facts. The destruction of such documentation, however, only fuels their cause by raising more questions of why a discussion on the facts of the matter can’t even be had.
This transparency issue itself isn’t new given California has been a battleground for police transparency since document purges of the 1970s. According to the publication, officers from the Los Angeles area hold a notorious reputation for destroying “more than four tons of personnel records rather than allow the information to be used in court”, leaving these activist groups vindicated without even having to prove their case, while at the same time wronged by the system’s lack of justice. The accountability of our enforcement institutions, paid by we the people, shouldn’t be a partisan issue for us to decide between tyranny or freedom.
This isn’t to say California isn’t seeing a progressive resistance. In a report from Vox, we’re given an introspective look into two of the laws newly passed under Gov Jerry Brown (D-CA) aimed at hold the police to account, which should have support from civil rights advocates to those concerned with accountable big government and unethical use-of-force (though always seem to fail to raise their hands or take a knee among the crowd). The first measure being Senate Bill 1421 allowing this public access to police records, while the second being Assembly Bill 748 requiring police departments to release footage of officer-involved shootings within a month of the incident. These are quality measures, but ironically require enforcement to make any difference.
“History in the making,” said state Sen. Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley), the author of Senate Bill 1421, in a statement from last September. “California is finally joining other states in granting access to the investigatory records on officer conduct that the public truly has a right to know. CA’s secrecy that has prevented public access to any & all police misconduct records about to be lifted. Californians have a right to know when officers are dishonest, use deadly force.”
Thanks for reading! This article was originally published for TrigTent.com, a bipartisan media platform for political and social commentary, truly diverse viewpoints and facts that don’t kowtow to political correctness.
For updates, feel free to follow @atheist_cvnt on his various social media pages on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or Gab. You can also contact through firstname.lastname@example.org for personal or business reasons.
Stay honest and radical. Cheers, darlings. 💋