New Snowden Documents Reveal NSA Track Down Bitcoin Users


Notorious for their behaviour in leading unconstitutional data collection and espionage programs, newly published Edward Snowden documents reveal the “#1 priority” under the watchful eye of the all-powerful United States National Security Agency (NSA): users of Bitcoin’s blockchain.

According to information obtained by journalist Sam Biddle for The Intercept, conspiracy theorists and market speculators rallying behind Bitcoin’s revolutionary idea of “techno-libertarian” finance were right to assume the worst of governments with an authoritarian interest in controlling the flow of money. This is especially true of cryptocurrencies that increase the ease of use on the online black market, offer users verifiable transactions alongside supposed assurances of online anonymity.

This, dear readers, is the enemy of governmental big tech — evidenced through the heavily redacted, top-secret internal memos provided by Snowden, the former NSA contractor and government whistleblower. He reveals the top priority of the spying agency was to “track down” word wide users of the cryptocurrency blockchain, amassing swaths of data on an unknown amount of overseas civilians and potentially US citizens from their trades to their entire online-technical information.

Biddle suggests this is done through the NSA program known as “MONKEYROCKET”, a sub-division of the OAKSTAR “counter-terrorism” initiative said to collect telecom data from around the world, specifically from the Middle East, Europe and South America, without a court granted warrant, the appearance of acting in national-world interest or countering known illegality. They appear to do this through the intercepting of fiber cables among other unspecified computer infrastructures from a collection of covert corporate partnerships (basic big tech spying practices and government-business corruption one can safely assume is one of the side of the unethical).

One NSA memo dated March 29, 2013 suggests the agency expanded their efforts beyond just the goings on of dark web trade (bitcoin for drugs or unregistered guns, for example), but to the bitcoin users en masse. One analyst briefly wrote of collected passwords, usernames, search histories, websites previously visited and the address of MAC computers to track these dubbed “BITCOIN Targets” in their NSA reports.

NSA agents also discussed obtaining these users’ IP addresses, unspecified network ports and the timestamps of when transactions take place — in simple terms, essentially making their own constructed ledger of the blockchain network and users’ real identities, left in the hands of the US government without a consenting legal process or specific justifications on every case. This was supposedly kept in the “XKeyScore” searching system at the time with file names such as “Provider user full.csv” suggesting NSA agents had these all on hand in a neat little package for the rainy day they need dirt.

Wikileaks Editor-In-Chief Julian Assange, also a critic of national security reporter Glenn Greenwald and his Intercept publication, took to Twitter to praise the report — while also condemning their editorial decisions to wait on releasing the info until several years after the fact and redacting key information in the document that may be within the public interest.

“Good work by [Sam Biddle],” Assange began, “but #Bitcoin’ers have suffered 4.5 years of attacks they didn’t need to because The Intercept, [Washington Post] and Guardian did not follow the [Wikileaks] model & continue to conceal most of the Snowden archive.”

The redacted documents fail to explain the exact practices or equipment being used, however they seem to being using the unspecified tools as some “long-term strategy” of 4-D political chess — using fake privacy software that was actually funnelling information directly to the agency themselves. While the NSA did not comment on the report, the documents state this was done to “attract targets engaged in terrorism [Al Qaeda]”. It’s believed this practice is similar to the cryptocurrency mining viruses that spread to more than 500,000 Windows computers by EternalBlue earlier this year — an online malware developed and exploited by the NSA among other hacking groups.

Evidently, we can’t exactly just take the unaccountable, spying government at their word! In the next few lines, NSA reporters wrote Bitcoin users of interest expand to “other targeted users… sought by NSA offices such as Int’l Crime & Narcotics, Follow-The-Money and Iran.”

Another NSA memo from March 8th, 2013 said they were “hoping to use [MONKEYROCKET] for their mission of looking at organized crime and cyber targets that utilize online e-currency services to move and launder money” — expanding their operation from serious crimes of terrorism and national security protection to just securing their tax-funded pay-check from criminals at the point of gun. Last month, TrigTent reported on how Bitcoin was losing favour among dark web users based on the high transaction fees, market unsustainability and the long transaction process — the inability to remain anonymous is the selling point behind the crypto market and puts Bitcoin in a tight spot among the everyman, casual internet trolls and criminals alike.

The government’s concern for organised crime rising out of an online, anarcho-capitalist system is not without merit, however. It was earlier this week when The Guardian reported on the disturbing link between the unknown mass of bitcoin users and the sharing of abusive imagery featuring children, according to German researchers of RWTH Aachen University. But does one organised racket of physical abuse justify the installing of another with privacy abuse and totalitarian enabling? Does the US, an their less liberty-oriented government allies, have a place as the world police, conducting unaccountable investigations and evidence collection before we’ve even committed crimes, all because Germany found up to 1,600 files on the blockchain, eight of which sexual content and three of them with links to hundreds of dark web content featuring child abuse?

I doubt the answer is all that simple given there’s no concrete who is deemed a “cyber target” in a non-justice system of surveillance where the online cops are judge, jury and, by extension to the rest of the government, executioner.

The Intercept raises questions about what this system would look like, particularly given the record on American police and “parallel construction”. This process was highlighted on The Jimmy Dore Show last month by former NSA employee of 30 years turned whistleblower William E. Binney who explained how spy agencies find evidence of criminal wrong doing (through illegal surveillance means without a warrant, mind you), tip the police on the suspect and their crime, and have the police construct their own trail to the criminal to obtain warrants and arrests without anything leading back to the government’s own spying crimes.

Patrick Toomey, an attorney working for the ACLU’s National Security Project, told The Intercept this leaves doubt in the American justice system:

“If the government’s criminal investigations secretly relied on NSA spying, that would be a serious concern. Individuals facing criminal prosecution have a right to know how the government came by its evidence, so that they can challenge whether the government’s methods were lawful. That is a basic principle of due process. The government should not be hiding the true sources for its evidence in court by inventing a different trail.”

Snowden Documents:

Sourced through The Intercept:

Thanks for reading!

Bailey T. Steen is a journalist, editor, artist and film critic based in Victoria, Australia, but is also Putin’s Puppet on occasion.

Articles published on Trigtent | Janks Reviews | Medium | Steemit

Updates and contact: @atheist_cvnt on Twitter | Instagram | Gab.Ai

Business or personal contact: | Comment below

Cheers, darlings!! 💋

troubled writer, depressed slug, bisexual simp, neoliberal socialist, trotskyist-bidenist, “corn-pop was a good dude, actually,” bio in pronouns: (any/all)

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store