Report: U.S. Government Wants Million Dollar “Hunter Killer Drone” For Border

BAILEY T. STEEN | THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2018

While activists fear the US- Mexico border is now a militarised nightmare, the Trump administration are ready to deploy multi-million dollar MQ-9 Reaper drones for increased security against the nation’s southern neighbour, according to new congressional testimony reported by TYT Investigates on Wednesday. In the report, two generals leading the National Guard have reportedly told the House Homeland Security Committee that the government are currently in the process of acquiring the “state-of-the-art hunter killer drone” for enhanced surveillance across the borders, while its potential use of military strikes went unquestioned by federal representatives.

The Reaper, notorious for its carrying of 15 times the military ordnance of its previous model, the MQ-1 Predator, is a remotely piloted drone that costs an estimated $16.9 million per unit while being able to carry a total of four Hellfire missiles that come with a reported blast radius of over 15 meters. This is by no means some ordinary toy drone for simple spying, but an aircraft capable of top-level surveillance imagery and storage and controversial “targeted killing” campaigns through the use preposterous explosions deemed necessary by government-military bureaucrats.

(MQ-9 Reaper drone, flown through Creech Air Force Base in Nevada, 2015)

According to another report from Gizmodo, President Trump signed memorandum orders to completely mobilise the National Guard forces to the US-Mexico border in April, citing questionable issues around unlawful crossers he says harm native Americans citizens.

“The security of the United States is imperiled by the drastic surge of illegal activity on the southern border,” Trump said in a White House memo, referring to the misrepresented caravan non-story several months back. “Large quantities of fentanyl, other opioids, and other dangerous and illicit drugs are flowing across our southern border and into our country at unprecedented levels, destroying the lives of our families and loved ones, [such as] Mara Salvatrucha [by] MS-13.”

“Other deadly transnational gangs are systematically exploiting our unsecured southern border to enter our country and develop operational capacity in American communities throughout the country,” the president continued to write. “The anticipated rapid rise in illegal crossings as we head into the spring and summer months threatens to overwhelm our Nation’s law enforcement capacities.” Shortly thereafter, Defense Secretary James Mattis authorised up to 4,000 National Guard troops to be deployed to the border.

But is his reasoning true?

According to Vox, citing data from The Department Of Homeland Security (DHS), illegal entries across the US southern border has been the lowest level since 1971 under President Richard Nixon. The report shows how despite thousands more border agents and improved equipment making the process of illegal entry incredibly difficult, there’s been a significant loss in illegal entry over time, breaking Trump’s narrative that requires voters to view the situation at the border as a drastic problem only his government takes seriously. Even when compared to the legacy of Bush and Obama, both viewed as unserious about border security, the current administration has detained less than half the amount of border crossers per month.

This isn’t an example of President Trump failing to catch criminals, as he so clearly wants to, but how there’s reduction in criminals to detain in the first place. Regardless, “the threat is real”, said DHS secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, justifying Trump’s increase in border officers and lavish military equipment the National Guard has previously called both “expensive and unnecessary”.

Over a few months time, tunes have changed. In his testimony, the National Guard’s Major General John F. Nichols said: “I think there will be a time in the future for the Reapers to be flying. I know that California has mentioned that; I think Arizona, as well. So we see that as a possible in the future.” He was backed up by Major General Michael T. McGuire, the National Guard’s adjutant general of Arizona, who was asked by Rep. Martha McSally (R-AZ) whether they’re engaged in talks to acquire the Reapers. McGuire simply replied, “Yes, we have been looking for that.”

He continued to explain the benefits of even acquiring Apache attack helicopters across the border. “While we are [currently] using the RC-26 and Lakota, there are other rotary wing and remotely piloted systems like MQ-9 and Apache that could be used in night, low-visibility to help support our Customs and Border Patrol agents out of the normal daytime cycle.” For those that don’t know, an RC-26 is also known as the Fairchild C-26 “Metroliner,” a turboprop spy plane reportedly used by the federal government and the Guard, as well as the Lakota referring to the UH-72 Lakota, which is a a light utility helicopter used by the same agencies.

Surely brave journalists the likes of CNN’s Jake Tapper and Chris Cuomo, always quick to criticise international programs in Medicare-For-All, have also read these reports and are twitching at the eye to ask the government “how the hell are you going to pay for all this?” Or is that job left up to the independent journalists, such as yours truly, to think over? Sure, it’s likely the drones would be primarily used in intelligence and surveillance operations, but where’s the money to address an already decreasing problem?

Will it be through higher taxes (which the government is so clearly against)? Decreased spending on certain useless problems (also against the government’s interests), the legalisation, regulation and taxation of these targeted drug products (good luck with that drug war, A.G. Sessions)? Will you be repurposing the ones used in expensive wars through Yemen, Somali, Sudan, any of the United States’ current military interventions? Can’t you use cheaper drones specialised for surveillance, instead of “hunter killer drones”? Why am I getting the distinct impression the bombing of brown people will repeat itself and we’ll ask questions about this militarisation later?

Thanks for reading!

Bailey T. Steen is a journalist, designer and film critic residing in the heart of Victoria, Australia. He’s also a proud Putin Puppet on occasion.

Articles published on TrigTent | Medium | Janks Reviews | Steemit

Updates and contact: @atheist_cvnt on Twitter | Instagram | Gab.Ai

Business or personal contact: bsteen85@gmail.com | Comment below

Cheers, darlings!! 💋

troubled writer, depressed slug, bisexual simp, neoliberal socialist, trotskyist-bidenist, “corn-pop was a good dude, actually,” bio in pronouns: (any/all)

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store