Schumer And Trump Are Playing A Dumb Game On DACA

(originally on TrigTent)


Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), amid government shutdowns and DACA-Border Wall negotiations, must surely be losing his fair share sleep. Outside his private home in New York City’s Prospect Park, mobs of furious DACA supporters, also known as “dreamers”, descended outside demanding the Senator give a clear answer on his immigration stance.

“If Chuck won’t let us dream,” they chanted, “we won’t let him sleep!”

According to the staunchly conservative Daily Wire, activists created a Facebook page called “Our Lives Are On The Line, Chuck” to spread awareness about the protests and encouraged people to rally around Schumer’s personal residence, demanding a clean DACA bill that provides full amnesty and legal citizenship for illegal immigrants brought into the country by their parents when they were under the legal age.

The Washington Post reports that a staggering 70% of the American public supports the DACA program and measures towards a path to citizenship, while at the same time 65% agree on a compromise that ensures more border security to prevent further illegal immigration issues. The only negatives seem to stem from the wall, gaining only a 35% approval in the same poll.

Heading into the government shutdown over DACA-border negotiations, Schumer could have used this support as momentum for a clear vision on Democratic immigration reform… and yet nothing of the sort came about. Partly because Schumer holds stranges, ever-evolving positions on these issues that can’t exactly be pinned down.

In 2017, White House budget director Mick Mulvaney was Fox News Sunday to discuss early concerns of a government shutdown over immigration and Trump’s proposed border wall.

“We want our priorities funded and one of the biggest priorities during the campaign was border security,” Mulvaney said, “keeping Americans safe, and part of that was a border wall.”

“We still don’t understand why the Democrats are so wholeheartedly against it,” he continued. “They voted for it in 2006. Then-Sen. Obama voted for it. Sen. Schumer voted for it. Sen. Clinton voted for it. So we don’t understand why Democrats are now playing politics just because Donald Trump is in office.”

What Mulvaney is citing is The Secure Fence Act of 2006, a bipartisan border security policy that was signed during the George W. Bush administration, which allowed for a 700 mile fence along the border of the United States and its neighbouring country Mexico, as well as extra security measures such as more vehicle barriers, checkpoint areas, more lighting to curb illegal immigration, as well as satellite technology to scan the area.

It is true that former Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), former Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and her fellow New York colleague Chuck Schumer voted for the legislation, joining 23 other Democratic senators once it passed the Senate by a majority vote of 80 to 19. What isn’t true is the definition of what a wall is.

As Politifact cited, Trump was critical of the 2006 legislation for being too ineffective and small. “Now we got lucky because it was such a little wall,” then-candidate Trump said, “it was such a nothing wall, no, they couldn’t get their environmental — probably a snake was in the way or a toad.”

By Trump’s own definition, either American already has a fully constructed “wall”, in which case why does he want to be secure funding for a second wall Democrats have supposedly already voted for, or that they only voted for a fence in which case shows Schumer to be more moderate on security.

Regardless of this past history, recent actions have brought Schumer’s moderate stance into question. Originally, Schumer proposed a $2B funding package to pay for Trump’s wall and extra security in exchange for DACA reform, the exact compromise that has a majority support sparing the inclusion of the wall.

Wait two days and, suddenly, this offer is rescinded by the senate minority who is now demanding for a clean DACA bill, suddenly saying it was the president who “couldn’t take ‘yes’ for an answer”, leading to the three day government shutdown.

Neither side is consistent on the perception of a government shutdown.

Whereas the right-wing spread the cute #SchumerShutdown hashtag, it was in 2013 when Donald Trump pinned shutdowns not just on then-President Obama, but on the president in general:

He stated the cause of the 2013 shutdown was the president failing to “lead,” to “get everyone in a room,” and to “make a deal.”

Senator Schumer, on the other hand, also showed deep discontent with holding government shutdowns in 2013, describing using immigration as leverage as quote “governmental chaos”:

“The basic line is: No matter how strongly one feels about an issue, you shouldn’t hold millions of people hostage,” he told ABC News’ anchor and last name tongue-twister George Stephanopoulos. “That’s what the other side is doing. That’s wrong and we can’t give in to that.”

But they have, taking their turns pointing the chaotic government finger at one another. With new reports from Politico suggesting that Democrats will give into a temporary three week budget without a DACA deal attached, citing “high anxiety” as the reason behind dropping support, and leaving dreamers relying on Senator Schumer in the same shocked state.

Thanks for reading!

Bailey T. Steen is a journalist, editor, artist and film critic based in Victoria, Australia, but is also Putin’s Puppeton occasion.

Articles published on Trigtent | Janks Reviews | Medium | Steemit

Updates and contact: @atheist_cvnt on Twitter | Instagram | Gab.Ai

Business or personal contact: | Comment below

Cheers, darlings!! x

troubled writer, depressed slug, bisexual simp, neoliberal socialist, trotskyist-bidenist, “corn-pop was a good dude, actually,” bio in pronouns: (any/all)

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store