The Sick Normalisation of George W. Bush

Your resistance shouldn’t be so big you invite the enemy to join.

Image for post
Image for post

BAILEY T. STEEN | TRIGTENT | FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2017

In the Trump era, where the president says he prefer war heroes “that weren’t captured”, a majority of Democrats seem to prefer war-criminal former presidents like George W. Bush.

In an Economist-YouGov poll released early last month, a staggering 51% of registered Democratic voters have a favourible view of the 43rd president, while just 42% have either somewhat or very unfavorable views.

The poll came after Bush delivered a speech rebuking the current President Donald J. Trump and his “tribal” policies. This is the first time Bush has ever recieved net-positive polling, particularly among the left, since his exit from the White House where held a dramatically low 25% among voters nationally.

Paired with the praise given to Republicans like John McCain, Bob Corker and Jeff Flake, we’re given an exclusive look at the problem with the faux-liberal movement known as #TheResistance: their tent is so big and tolerant, they’re even willing to invite the enemy inside.

Keith Olbermann, now branding himself as the political commentator for his show “The Resistance”, released by the rarely political fashion outlet GQ, went on Twitter and The View declaring:

MSNBC host Joy Ann Reid fawning over 43 with:

Democrat’s House Minority Leader for California, Nancy Pelosi, praying for the days of George W. Bush to return:

Even Independent Senator for Vermont Bernie Sanders, the most popular politician in the country, refused to call the former president , brushing his character off as :

Now, I’m no conservative. I don’t subscribe to modern conservatism. But even centre-left liberals know when you’re taking the piss out of your opponent.

Let’s consider Sanders’ glib notions of Bush on its face. , not Okay. That would make The Iraq War, which saw between 100,000 to over a million civillian deaths, your normal conservative position, would it not?

Last time I recall, it was Donald Trump, who said , that won the Republican nomination over Jeb Bush by over 45% of the vote. And Hillary Clinton, 2016’s Democratic nominee, who was in hot water for actually voting with Bush on Iraqi intervention:

In fact, it was Trump who made the fiscal conservative argument on Iraq and Afghanistan, which he has since walked back on after taking office:

Estimated costs for The Iraq War, cited by Reuters, rank as low as $2.4 trillion, alongside the $490 billion in benefits owed to war veterans. The highest estimates being $6 trillion, from Business Insider in 2013. All of which could increase over time due to inflation. Hardly a fiscially conservative venture.

Or a pro-military venture, considering Bush and Co’s WMD lies which sent soldiers to war, against a country which didn’t attack them, on false evidence. Sanders and the like would also have to toss Bush’s torture program, paired with the establishment of Guantanamo Bay, an extra-judicial prison which held captives without trial, as the making of conservative values.

Image for post
Image for post

Since Nixon, who’s hardly a person to admire, the right have talked of big game regarding their and implimenting . Whether it’s just a talking point or a consistent value, conservatives use the justice system as their ethical value of choice.

But take Bush’s suspension of habeas corpus — where the government is required to bring a prisoner before a judge and provide legal rationale for imprisonment. How is this maintaining the law? He actively changed it to suit his “war against terror”, when it was revealed of the supposed terrorists he captured without due process, there’s many who may in fact be innocent.

Lawrence B. Wilkerson, the retired Republican Army colonel and former chief of staff to then-Secretary of State Colin Powell, told The Associated Press.

Image for post
Image for post

Wilkerson continued that intelligence analysts would just gather

The man collapsed his presideny in eight years, his administration seeing both the great recession and one of the greatest amount of casulties in American foreign policy history, yet what gave this Republican president his recent boost among Democrats? A condemnation of President Trump in a speech.

Not policy. Not actions. Words.

And apparently to partisan Democrats, they must be the best words, so spellbinding they normalise a record like this.

My content has been graciously published on For updates and contact, the best place to touch base is on

Written by

troubled writer, depressed slug, bisexual simp, neoliberal socialist, trotskyist-bidenist, “corn-pop was a good dude, actually,” bio in pronouns: (any/all)

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store